From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marshall, Steve" <smarshall(at)wsi(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded |
Date: | 2007-09-15 17:24:27 |
Message-ID: | 46EC154B.2050401@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>> yeah testing that patch now (seems to apply just fine on -HEAD) but it
>> seems that there is something strange going on because I just got:
>
> ! ERROR: could not read block 2 of relation 1663/16384/2606: read only 0 of 8192 bytes
>
> Is that repeatable? What sort of filesystem are you testing on?
that box is slow - still testing ...
> (soft-mounted NFS by any chance?)
no - local SATA disk with ext3 (no OS related errors and SMART is clean too)
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-15 23:49:03 | Hmmm ... isn't count_nondeletable_pages all wet? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-15 17:03:05 | Re: PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-09-15 18:51:19 | HOT add-on patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-15 17:03:05 | Re: PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded |