Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Date: 2007-09-08 22:57:33
Message-ID: 46E328DD.1040103@opencloud.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer wrote:

> It's simpler, there's about half a dozen classes and one if statement as
> opposed to implementing the Connection and Statement interfaces for 3
> versions of jdbc and yet another build system that does the same.

How do you avoid wrapping Connection/Statement/etc and still avoid the
problems we discussed with Statement.close()? Can you send me a patch
for review?

-O

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2007-09-08 23:05:41 Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2007-09-08 22:50:59 Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?