Re: SAN vs Internal Disks

From: Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>
To: Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com>
Cc: Harsh Azad <harsh(dot)azad(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SAN vs Internal Disks
Date: 2007-09-06 19:40:25
Message-ID: 46E057A9.4040606@tweakers.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 6-9-2007 20:29 Mark Lewis wrote:
> Maybe I'm jaded by past experiences, but the only real use case I can
> see to justify a SAN for a database would be something like Oracle RAC,
> but I'm not aware of any PG equivalent to that.

PG Cluster II seems to be able to do that, but I don't know whether
that's production quality already...

Arjen

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patric 2007-09-06 20:08:45 Reasonable amount of indices
Previous Message Arjen van der Meijden 2007-09-06 19:38:02 Re: SAN vs Internal Disks