Re: loose ends in lazy-XID-assigment patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Subject: Re: loose ends in lazy-XID-assigment patch
Date: 2007-09-05 18:48:09
Message-ID: 46DEF9E9.3050809@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> * Should CSV-mode logging include the virtual transaction ID (VXID) in
> addition to, or instead of, XID? There will be many situations where
> there is no XID.
>
>
>

But will there be any where we care? Isn't the point of this to restrict
allocation of a real XID to situations where having one might actually
matter? All the rest seems to me just bookkeeping.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-09-05 18:54:26 Re: Final background writer cleanup for 8.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-05 18:41:20 Should pointers to PGPROC be volatile-qualified?