| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Password requirement in windows installer |
| Date: | 2007-08-31 16:00:58 |
| Message-ID: | 46D83B3A.9010404@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Decibel! wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:02:49AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> Decibel! wrote:
>>> Why does the windows installer require a password for the superuser
>>> account, since it's perfectly legitimate not to have a password on that
>>> account? I could see perhaps producing a warning, but making this a hard
>>> requirement seems like overkill.
>> Security out of the box. There are few, if any good reasons not to have
>> a password on the account, and if you really want to remove it, you can
>> do so in psql or pgAdmin.
>
> Is there something insecure about using ident sameuser for localhost
> authentication on Windows?
Windows doesn't have ident (though there are 3rd party products).
Regards Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-08-31 16:16:49 | Re: Final background writer cleanup for 8.3 |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-31 15:49:08 | Re: [GENERAL] Undetected corruption of table files |