| From: | "korry(dot)douglas" <korry(dot)douglas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: enum types and binary queries |
| Date: | 2007-08-30 19:47:24 |
| Message-ID: | 46D71ECC.2080500@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> What if we just defined the binary format as being identical to the text
> format, ie, the enum label? A bit silly but at least it would eliminate
> the gotcha that binary I/O fails.
>
Seems like it would make a lot more sense to the client application that
way too...
-- Korry
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-08-30 21:01:25 | Re: Advice on MyXactMade* flags, MyLastRecPtr, pendingDeletes and lazy XID assignment |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-30 19:21:28 | Re: enum types and binary queries |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-30 20:08:41 | Re: HOT patch - version 14 |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-08-30 19:39:59 | Re: HOT patch - version 14 |