Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the
Date: 2007-08-30 16:21:58
Message-ID: 46D6EEA6.803@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:
> Ok, do you need it on unixware?
> do you need it more than once a week?
> FYI, centaurc is running make check for 3 hours now and has'nt finished!
>
>

The platform probably doesn't matter so much, I suspect. Once a week on
a separately registered animal should be fine. Whatever you have that's
fastest.

And don't be surprised how long it takes - "make check" on my little
PIII/FC5 box took 7 hours.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message User Machr2 2007-08-30 16:22:24 pgcheck - pokus: improved comments of code
Previous Message User Machr2 2007-08-30 16:19:27 pgcheck - pokus: improved comments of code

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charlie Savage 2007-08-30 16:41:13 Re: Some more msvc++ 8.2.4 build feedback
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-30 16:21:31 Re: Why is there a tsquery data type?