| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is there a better way to do this? |
| Date: | 2007-08-29 03:11:52 |
| Message-ID: | 46D4E3F8.6090809@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/07 20:06, Tom Lane wrote:
[snip]
>
> As Michael says, the speed argument is really kinda minor compared
> to the other ones, but it's real enough.
Every little bit counts, though. For example, if it's part of an
otherwise computationally-intensive operation that you're performing
on 20 million rows, you'll definitely see the difference.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG1OP4S9HxQb37XmcRAvxUAJ0TFcC06TgAsOv8aou3BC1pJpbADwCgkQyy
Ib8H44C7d8mvvWfsHbWjFVE=
=3/7d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | smithveg | 2007-08-29 03:33:06 | Can postgresql support chinese word? |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-29 02:04:26 | Re: Seeking datacenter PITR backup suggestions |