Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Derek,
>
>> Regardless, even if Josh changes the company name, I believe that the
>> benefits far outweigh that potential negative and we should move
>> forward.
>
> You say that because you weren't around when PostgreSQL, Inc. was active.
> There was a time when the *first* question I had to answer at a booth was
> to explain that we were not PostgreSQL, Inc. I don't want to go back to
> that time.

Nor do I. However, that was a different time and a time when PostgreSQL
was barely known, which is certainly not the case now.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1He1ATb/zqfZUUQRAo9BAJ0TL6whnVxPp2cQ3NDmP/7CbljxqACgoHeS
XO2loyRnmoPnYVKyBjE/P+M=
=hBEA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----