Block size with pg_dump?

From: Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8(at)verizon(dot)net>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Block size with pg_dump?
Date: 2007-08-26 21:35:15
Message-ID: 46D1F213.4010107@verizon.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

When I make a backup of a database, I put the output file directly on
magnetic tape; i.e., my command looks like this:

pg_dump --file=/dev/st0 ....

This way I do not have to worry if the total backup exceeds the size of a
file system, and it saves me the trouble of copying it to the tape as a
separate step. My current tapes will hold 20 GBytes raw or 40GBytes if I
enable hardware compression (assuming 2:1 compression happens). Now it says
in the documentation that if I use format c it will compress the data in
software, so I doubt the hardware compression will do much.

I do not know what blocksize pg_dump uses, or if it insists on a particular
blocksize on input.

Now my tape drive will work with any blocksize, but prefers 65536-byte
blocks. I do not see any options for this in pg_dump, but I could pipe the
output of pg_dump through dd I suppose to make any blocksize I want.

On the way back, likewise I could pipe the tape through dd before giving it
to pg_restore.

Does pg_dump care what blocksize it gets? If so, what is it?

- --
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 17:20:01 up 17 days, 20:42, 5 users, load average: 5.12, 5.26, 5.21
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG0fITPtu2XpovyZoRAouwAKCTEour7jbi3uKWmEjerOM3U51xKQCeKYrQ
6jbamlqvTvH04jD7oRbTAKY=
=piNw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas 2007-08-26 23:35:50 List of FKeys ?
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2007-08-25 22:42:56 Re: Returning array of IDs as a sub-query with group-by