Re: SQL feature requests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Ben Tilly <btilly(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL feature requests
Date: 2007-08-23 17:26:02
Message-ID: 46CDC32A.8010300@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chuck McDevitt wrote:
> Sometimes supporting "de-facto" standards as well as official standards
> makes sense.
>
>
>

On that basis we would support huge pieces of stuff that emulates MySQL
too. Or perhaps you'd like us to follow Oracle's treatment of NULL. Who
gets to choose what is the de facto standard we follow?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-23 17:29:53 Re: SQL feature requests
Previous Message Ben Tilly 2007-08-23 17:25:48 Re: SQL feature requests