Re: 2-phase commit

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-09-29 16:20:00
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4962026@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > > Or the slave could reject the request.
> >
> > Huh? The slave has that option?? In what circumstance?
>
> I thought the slave could reject if someone local already had the row
> locked.

No, not at all. The slave would need to reject phase 1 "commit ready"
for this.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-29 16:20:05 Re: more i18n/l10n issues
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-09-29 16:17:19 Re: more i18n/l10n issues