| From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, "Ron Snyder" <snyder(at)roguewave(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't |
| Date: | 2002-08-27 07:34:11 |
| Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA4961E65@m0114.s-mxs.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> What we really need is some mode on template1 that says, "I am not
> world-writable, but the admin hasn't made me world-non-writable, so I
> will create new databases that are world-writable". Does that make
> sense?
I think template1 public should be non-world-writeable by default, and pass that
to newly created databases. What exactly was it, why we don't want that ?
Backwards compatibility ? Imho doing one (additional) grant after creating a db
cannot be such a problem, no ?
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2002-08-27 11:31:31 | Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735 |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-08-27 07:33:37 | REINDEX ALL and CLUSTER ALL |