Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Date: 2002-08-28 07:29:46
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA48879E0@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> My guess, seeing as very few probably use LIMIT and FOR UPDATE together,
> is to swap them and document it in the release notes. Was I correct in
> my guess?

Sounds good to me.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2002-08-28 07:30:13 unsubscribe
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2002-08-28 07:22:53 Re: Open 7.3 items