Re: Rules and Views

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Curt Sampson" <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rules and Views
Date: 2002-08-01 10:23:03
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA48879A6@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> But the message I was replying to was a similar union query, and I was
> thinking that that person might be having a similar initial intuitive
> reaction, "well, it looks kinda the same." I just wanted to note that
> you need to check this stuff with explain, rather than
> blindly assuming
> you know what's going on.

I had a "union all" view, which is actually a quite different animal than
a "union" view which needs to eliminate duplicates before further processing.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-01 10:29:04 Re: Rules and Views
Previous Message Karel Zak 2002-08-01 10:01:52 Re: getpid() function