Re: sequence indexes

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sequence indexes
Date: 2002-01-25 21:55:58
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA42128E2@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I've looked at the problem a little bit --- there's literature more
> recent than Lehmann-Yao that talks about how to do btree compaction
> without losing concurrency. But it didn't get done for 7.2.

Yes, there must be. Informix handles this case perfectly.
(It uses a background btree cleaner)

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-25 22:05:46 Re: sequence indexes
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2002-01-25 21:51:24 Re: Savepoints