Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joe Conway (wwc)" <jconway(at)cox(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Fernando Nasser" <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: 2002-01-25 21:36:37
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA42128E0@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > I am starting to see the advantages and like it. I also like the exact
> > name "public" for the public schema.
>
> I wonder if we should think about a 'group' area so people in a group
> can create things that others in the group can see, but not people
> outside the group.

A group simply chooses a special schema name for their group.

Maybe an extra in the ACL area so you can grant privs for a whole
schema.

grant select on schema blabla to "JoeLuser"

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2002-01-25 21:51:24 Re: Savepoints
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2002-01-25 21:03:53 Re: Savepoints