Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L

From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L
Date: 2002-01-14 16:02:44
Message-ID: 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB4AC@m0114.s-mxs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom writes:
> "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> > The problem is, that the default on AIX is to produce architecture
> > independent code (arch=COM). Unfortunately not all AIX architectures
> > seem to have these instructions.
>
> AIX does more than one architecture? Hmm, s_lock.h doesn't
> know that...

It does not need to, since all of them currently use cs().
The compilers by default generate executables that run on all
of the different processors (they are all Risc).

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Renters 2002-01-14 16:12:48 Re: bug in permission handling?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-14 15:45:24 Re: [HACKERS] articles [was: mysql-pgsql comparison]