Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight

From: Chris Mair <chris(at)1006(dot)org>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
Date: 2007-07-25 05:31:39
Message-ID: 46A6E03B.5090406@1006.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> After today's flurry of messages on this topic, I found myself wanting a
> summary of what I'd learned about the current state of things before the
> details slipped away. Somewhere in the middle of writing that, it
> morphed into an advocacy piece, so I figured why not put it on the Wiki:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Why_PostgreSQL_instead_of_MySQL
>
>
> I may circle back to filling some of the stub sections myself
> eventually, you're all encouraged to beat me to it.

Hi,

2 additions to the mail-to-wiki gateway ;)
(I don't have wiki write access).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, it doesn't support transactions that would allow the database to have [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACID
ACID] properties.

->

In addition, it doesn't support transactions or foreign key constraints that would allow the database to have
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACID ACID] properties.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also mention my favourite MySQL gotcha
( from the 5.1 manual at http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/create-table.html ):

"The CHECK clause is parsed but ignored by all storage engines."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bye,
Chris.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2007-07-25 05:39:57 Re: Updated tsearch documentation
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-07-25 05:00:59 PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight