Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32
Date: 2007-07-23 15:39:01
Message-ID: 46A4CB95.1080105@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I see though that the comment in pg_config.h.win32 claims it was derived
>>> from mechanically-generated configure output, so unless that's lying
>>> it should be OK already.
>>>
>
>
>> It's not - it started out as a copy of the output of ./configure on mingw.
>>
>
> "Started out as"? Good luck keeping it in sync, if it's not
> mechanically created.
>
>
>

ISTM this is symptomatic of the MSVC build system problems. I understand
why Dave and Magnus want to use it, but essentially it is breaking one
of the original requirements of our building on Windows at all, namely
that we use a unified build tool chain. It's a thousand pities.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-23 16:00:31 Re: 8.2 is 30% better in pgbench than 8.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-07-23 15:29:00 Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32