Re: syslogging oddity

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: syslogging oddity
Date: 2007-07-23 14:59:02
Message-ID: 46A4C236.8050205@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>
>> It could be interesting to have it write it *to the logfile* though, since
>> it'd then at least be in the same place as the others.
>>
>
> It does that too, no?
>
>
>
Yes, but if we make the message DEBUG1 it won't normally. Still, I think
we could live with that. I'm not inclined to waste too much time on it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-07-23 15:05:09 Why is lc_messages superuser only?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-07-23 14:57:24 Re: syslogging oddity