Re: insert vs select into performance

From: Thomas Finneid <tfinneid(at)student(dot)matnat(dot)uio(dot)no>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: insert vs select into performance
Date: 2007-07-18 19:11:20
Message-ID: 469E65D8.4030600@ifi.uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> As they're individual inserts, I think what you're seeing is overhead
> from calling this statement 100,000 times, not just on the server but
> also the overhead through JDBC. For comparison, try
>
> CREATE TABLE ciu_data_type_copy LIKE ciu_data_type;
>
> INSERT INTO ciu_data_type_copy (id, loc_id, value3, value5, value8,
> value9, value10, value11)
> SELECT id, loc_id, value3, value5, value8, value9, value10, value11
> FROM ciu_data_type;
>
> I think this would be more comparable to what you're seeing.

This is much faster than my previous solution, but, I also tested two
other solutions
- a stored function with array arguments and it performed 3 times better.
- jdbc with COPY patch performed 8.4 times faster with text input,
expect binary input to be even faster.

regards

thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Finneid 2007-07-18 19:13:14 Re: insert vs select into performance
Previous Message Thomas Finneid 2007-07-18 19:08:08 Re: insert vs select into performance