Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Patric de Waha <lists(at)p-dw(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Date: 2007-07-14 16:25:18
Message-ID: 4698F8EE.8090603@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> No wonder, I got IO problems with such a fragmentation.
>
> For people not very familiar with postgres especially those coming
> from mysql,
> i'd recommend paying attention to this.

Definitely. The problem here is that you just aren't vacuuming enough,
not that you didn't vacuum full. I would suggest reviewing autovacuum
and seeing if that will help you.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards,
> patric de waha
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-07-14 16:32:48 Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Previous Message Patric de Waha 2007-07-14 15:50:39 Vacuum full considered useful ;)