Re: compiler warnings on the buildfarm

Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>> I don't see any "const" keyword there.
>
>> Right after that:
>
>>> where int conv(int num_msg, const struct pam_message **msg, struct pam_response **resp, void *appdata_ptr);
>
>> How confusing...
>
> And the pam_start page he cited earlier has a different set of typos in
> its version of the struct :-(. Still, that's two out of three places
> that say it's const, and Solaris appears to be the only implementation
> that has chosen to read it as not const.

Yes, Agree. I try to send request to security team for explanation.
Maybe original author also overlooked it as me today :-).

Zdenek