| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL related pressrelease |
| Date: | 2007-07-13 09:56:59 |
| Message-ID: | 46974C6B.7060502@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> EnterpriseDB is 200% faster than an untuned PostgreSQL
>>
>
> This sentence is true, even if it is a generalisation: the specific
> workload tested was an OLTP workload. EnterpriseDB ships with a feature
> called DynaTune that makes this so. My observation is that it does a
> good job.
>
Please note that the website doesn't mention "untuned". We all know that
an untuned PostgreSQL is usually slower than a tuned installation.
Autotuning is a fine feature, but the EnterpriseDB website and marketing
stuff gives the impression that the Enterprise _core_ system is 200 %
better.
Regards
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-13 10:08:49 | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-13 09:46:10 | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL related pressrelease |