Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark

From: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Philippe Amelant <pamelant(at)companeo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark
Date: 2007-07-11 15:48:42
Message-ID: 4694FBDA.7040900@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Its hard to do direct comparison since that one used a different
commercial application server than the PostgreSQL test.. As we do more
tests with the help of the community, hopefully we can understand where
the CPU cycles are spent and see how to make them more efficient...

Stay tuned!!

-Jignesh

Philippe Amelant wrote:
> am I wrong or DB2 9.1 is faster on less powerfull hardware ?
>
> Le lundi 09 juillet 2007 à 11:57 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah a écrit :
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I think this result will be useful for performance discussions of
>> postgresql against other databases.
>>
>> http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/
>>
>> More on Josh Berkus's blog:
>>
>> http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/database/soup/archives/postgresql-publishes-first-real-benchmark-17470
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jignesh
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bryan Murphy 2007-07-11 15:51:51 Re: Two questions.. shared_buffers and long reader issue
Previous Message Alan Hodgson 2007-07-11 15:47:44 Re: WALL on controller without battery?