Re: Unicode escapes in literals

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unicode escapes in literals
Date: 2008-10-23 15:11:33
Message-ID: 4688.1224774693@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> There are some other disadvantages for making a function call. You
> couldn't use that kind of literal in any other place where the parser
> calls for a string constant: role names, tablespace locations,
> passwords, copy delimiters, enum values, function body, file names.

Good point. I'm okay with supporting the feature only when database
encoding is UTF8.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-10-23 15:11:39 Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-23 15:08:07 Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?