Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-21 13:11:14
Message-ID: 467A78F2.9060408@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>> Btw.: I'm currently at DebConf in Edinburgh. On Scottish motorway signage,
>>> "5m" means "five miles". Even the Americans do that better.
>> Yeah, but you know *exactly* what it means :-p
>
> Well the good news is that as long as you drive at exactly 60mph you can just
> take the "m" to mean minutes...
>

Thats a good point. Perhaps we can similarly throttle the logging rate
of the server. Just fix it at DEBUG4 or thereabouts and drop random
messages as required...

/D

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-06-21 13:12:20 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-06-21 13:05:53 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent