Re: standard LOB support

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: "EBIHARA, Yuichiro" <ebihara(at)iplocks(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: standard LOB support
Date: 2007-06-20 20:16:07
Message-ID: 46798B07.6060604@g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

EBIHARA, Yuichiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing a software that supports several RDBMSs including PostgreSQL.
>
> The software needs an ability to handle large objects and now it uses 'bytea' datatype for binary
> data and 'text' for text data.
> But for portability, I'd rather use BLOB and CLOB defined by the SQL standards indeed.
>
> Is there any plan to support BLOB and CLOB in future releases?
>
Looking at the spec, and postgresql's implementation, I can't see much
reason you couldn't just use a domain to declare that a bytea is a blob
and varchar is a clob.

Unless there's some spefici thing you need I'm not seeing.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-06-20 21:08:10 Re: VACUUM ANALYZE extremely slow
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-06-20 20:09:30 Re: Running OS-level programs from Postgres?

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kalle Hallivuori 2007-06-20 21:48:56 Copy with Streams only for 8.3dev
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-06-20 15:16:29 Re: Log files cluttered with jdbc3/4 for pg8.2