| From: | Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication |
| Date: | 2007-06-18 18:32:43 |
| Message-ID: | 4676CFCB.5070505@emolecules.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Not quite... there's still Postgres-R, see www.postgres-r.org And I'm
> continuously working on it, despite not having updated the website for
> almost a year now...
>
> I planned on releasing the next development snapshot together with 8.3,
> as that seems to be delayed, that seems realistic ;-)
Is Postgres-R the same thing as Slony-II? There's a lot of info and news around about Slony-II, but your web page doesn't seem to mention it.
While researching replication solutions, I had a heck of a time sorting out the dead or outdated web pages (like the stuff on gborg) from the active projects.
Either way, it's great to know you're working on it.
Craig
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-06-18 18:38:32 | Re: [GENERAL] [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kostyrka | 2007-06-18 18:29:42 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] Postgres VS Oracle |