Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Well my argument has always been the "core" feature argument. Perhaps I
>> am missing some info here, but when I read what you wrote, I read that
>> Tsearch will now be "harder" to work with. Not easier. :(
>
> Then you misread it. What I was proposing was essentially that there
> won't be any need for pg_dump support because everything's built-in
> (at least as far as parsers/dictionaries go).
>
> As for the permissions issues, that's just formalizing something that's
> true today with the contrib module: if you change a configuration, it's
> *your* problem whether that invalidates any table entries, the system
> won't take care of it for you.

O.k. :)

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/