Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Vadim Mikheev <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-28 08:10:11
Message-ID: 4671.977991011@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> Smart Shutdown request at Thu Dec 28 02:41:49 2000
>> DEBUG: shutting down
>> FATAL 2: Checkpoint lock is busy while data base is shutting down
>> Shutdown failed - abort

> It's not just on Alpha; I've seen that on my i386 Linux system.

Oooh, that's interesting. I was just blindly assuming that it was
a problem with the Alpha spinlock code (we've sure heard plenty of
discussion of same). But maybe there's an actual logic bug in the
checkpoint code. I don't see one in a quick scan though.

FWIW, I do *not* see this behavior on HPUX. It seems perfectly
reproducible on the Debian Alpha box. Is it reproducible on your
i386 box, or only sometimes?

Vadim, any ideas?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2000-12-28 08:24:56 Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2000-12-28 07:59:06 Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)