Re: pipe chunks protocol

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Yeah, what I did was to wind back the chunk size - try 128 and you'll
>> see plenty of chunked messages :-) But we really need to do this with
>> installcheck-parallel to exercise it properly.
>>
>
> Doh, of course. I ran installcheck-parallel with log_statement = all
> and the chunk size reduced to 64, and saw no apparent problems.
> So that gives me at least enough confidence to apply it to HEAD.
>
>
>>> (The
>>> patch seems to need some adjustment to apply against 8.2, though.)
>>>
>
>
>> I know we normally try not to do this, but I'd be happy to wait for the
>> back branches in this case.
>>
>
> [confused...] How do you envision proceeding exactly?
>
>
>

Never mind, if you're happy adapting and applying this right away to
back branches then I'm happy too. I just didn't want to have to wait
much before I start work on the CSVlog adaptation.

cheers

andrew