Is this a feature?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Is this a feature?
Date: 2007-06-11 17:27:01
Message-ID: 466D85E5.7030601@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

It is past feature freeze which means we can't introduce new features.
It is possible to submit a patch for slightly different logging output?

Take the following:

INFO: analyzing "pg_catalog.pg_authid"
INFO: "pg_authid": scanned 1 of 1 pages, containing 5 live rows and 0
dead rows; 5 rows in sample, 5 estimated total rows

The above is completely redundant. Why not just say:

INFO: "pg_authid": scanned 1 of 1 pages, containing 5 live rows and 0
dead rows; 5 rows in sample, 5 estimated total rows

If the first line is meant to be an indicator, then make the above line
do this:

INFO: analyzing "pg_catalog.pg_authid" :

Don't add a new line, and when the next step of information comes up
append it to the existing line to get:

INFO: analyzing "pg_catalog.pg_authid": scanned 1 of 1 pages, containing
5 live rows and 0 dead rows; 5 rows in sample, 5 estimated total rows

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-06-11 18:35:48 Re: Is this a feature?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-06-11 17:03:05 ecpg compile error in regression tests