Re: Creditcard Number Security was Re: Encrypted column

From: "Richard P(dot) Welty" <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Creditcard Number Security was Re: Encrypted column
Date: 2007-06-07 20:03:37
Message-ID: 46686499.9060103@averillpark.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Guy Fraser wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 16:51 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Yes. I agree, in principle, that "don't store them" is the best
>> advice -- this is standard _Translucent Databases_ advice, too. For
>> the least-stealable data is the data you don't have.
>>
>> But if there is a business case, you have to do the trade off. And
>> security is always a tradeoff (to quote Schneier); just do it well.
>> (Someone else's advice about hiring a security expert to audit this
>> sort of design is really a good idea.)
>>

> Have you thought about setting up an account with PayPal, and having
> people pay through PayPal?
>
> Let PayPal deal with the security, and credit card info, after all it's
> what they do.
>
at the day job, when we switched from paypal (who we found very
undependable)
to authorize.net, we were very pleased to discover that authorize.net
would take
care of the credit card numbers for us, so we didn't have to try to
secure them beyond
the usual requirements while the numbers are in transit.

i would definitely recommend outsourcing for this if at all possible.

richard

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2007-06-07 20:33:59 Re: Inheritance and shared sequence
Previous Message Jerry Sievers 2007-06-07 19:49:48 Re: Join field values