Re: Integrity on large sites

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Integrity on large sites
Date: 2007-05-30 19:31:35
Message-ID: 465DD117.90301@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> I can't imagine Flickr or Slashdot ...
>
> I'm pretty sure I remember reading that Slashdot had to put enormous
> amounts of cacheing in front of their DB to keep it from falling over
> on a regular basis.

Yes, slashdot and flickr both use memcached:

http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/2005-November/001726.html
"...we use both memcached and squid at flickr. ..."

http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/2003-July/000017.html
"...Slashdot's been using memcached to serve its comment text"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message novnov 2007-05-30 19:37:33 Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored?
Previous Message Brandon Aiken 2007-05-30 19:16:26 Re: Uhm, so, yeah, speaking of /.