Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry
Date: 2010-05-20 19:20:04
Message-ID: 46494.192.75.139.250.1274383204.squirrel@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 20, 2010 3:06 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> huh? that does not make any sense at all - the licence the submitter
>> chooses _IS_ displayed on the main overview page of the project (see for
>> example: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgbouncer/).
>
> That doesn't happen automatically -- after acceptance, the project owner
> needs to select a license a second time. That's why so many projects
> have no license.
>

How to do that is far from clear.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-05-20 19:22:47 Re: Fwd: PGBuildfarm member colugos Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to StartDb-C:3 failure
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-05-20 19:06:31 Re: Clarifications of licences on pgfoundry