| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use of ActiveSnapshot |
| Date: | 2007-05-14 20:59:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4648CDB4.2080507@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/14/2007 4:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
>> Which means that the 8.3 fix for the reproducible backend crash, I
>> posted earlier, is to have SPI_cursor_open() save and restore
>> ActiveSnapshot while calling RevalidateCachedPlan(). I'll cross check
>> that this fixes this symptom and commit later today.
>
> No, the correct fix is to do that inside RevalidateCachedPlan ... and I
> already did it.
Works for me. It fixed the Slony test that actually tripped over the
bug. Thanks.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2007-05-14 21:13:09 | Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-14 20:26:59 | Re: Use of ActiveSnapshot |