| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
| Date: | 2007-05-14 11:46:45 |
| Message-ID: | 46484C25.1050801@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>> Close. There was an Msys build from the 9th running on port 5432.
>
>> 2) VC++ and Msys builds will both happily start on the same
>> port at the same time. The first one to start listens on 5432
>> until it shuts down, at which point the second server takes
>> over seamlessly! It doesn't matter which is started first -
>> it's as if Windows is queuing up the listens on the port.
>
> Um, we explicitly set SO_REUSEADDR. So the port will happily allow a
> second bind.
So we do. I must confess I didn't look at the code, just spoke with
Magnus who agreed it didn't seem like it should be possible.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-05-14 11:51:39 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-14 11:41:45 | Re: Seq scans roadmap |