Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Date: 2007-05-14 08:05:15
Message-ID: 4648183B.7080208@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Not to my knowledge, but I have no method of testing what's going on,
> and I hate guessing like this - in fact this is what has worried me all
> along about supporting MSVC builds - we always said we didn't want to
> have to have 2 build environments, but now we have two and we'll be
> supporting them forever, even though one of them is not used by 95% of
> our developers. I realise that MSVC builds are likely to perform better,
> but we have now got a situation where we are likely to have breakage on
> a regular basis, ISTM.

It's not just that they perform better - we also get a debugger that
actually works well (yes, I know newer gdb's apparently do work on
Mingw; but even a fully functional GDB doesn't come close to VC++), but
more importantly it's looking more and more like it'll be our only way
of producing a 64bit build for Windows.

> (sorry to grumble - it's been a very frustrating 24 hours)

:-(

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-05-14 08:16:15 Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2007-05-14 03:58:14 Concurrently updating an updatable view