From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: enable parallel query by default? |
Date: | 2016-02-08 21:29:50 |
Message-ID: | 4645.1454966990@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> One of the questions I have about parallel query is whether it should
> be enabled by default. That is, should we make the default value of
> max_parallel_degree to a value higher than 0? Perhaps 1, say?
I'm not sure I'm on board with that as a releaseable default, but there
certainly would be an argument for turning it on from now to say mid
beta, so as to improve test coverage. I think we've done similar things
in the past.
I don't understand however how that doesn't break the regression tests?
Surely we've got lots of EXPLAIN queries that would change.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-02-08 21:30:10 | Re: enable parallel query by default? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-02-08 21:26:16 | Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes |