Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)

From: Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)
Date: 2007-05-11 14:20:30
Message-ID: 46447BAE.6000608@3times25.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ron Johnson wrote:

> Call me elitist, but I've used OpenVMS for so long that if it's not
> a VMS-style shared-disk cluster, it's a false usage of the word.

Okay, you're an elitist...

> Compute-clusters excluded, of course.
>
> - --
> Ron Johnson, Jr.
> Jefferson LA USA

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Childs 2007-05-11 14:37:54 Re: are foreign keys realized as indexes?
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2007-05-11 13:59:51 Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)