Re: documentation about explicit locking

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: documentation about explicit locking
Date: 2018-07-30 20:27:14
Message-ID: 4643ae11-ef6e-e4be-e133-22885120bc59@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19/07/2018 06:17, Amit Langote wrote:
> When playing with this, I observed that a less user-friendly error message
> is emitted if multiple sessions race to create the same collation.
>
> Session 1:
> begin;
> create collation collname (...);
>
> Session 2:
> create collation collname (...);
> <blocks for lock on pg_collation>
>
> Session 1:
> commit;
>
> Session 2:
> ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint
> "pg_collation_name_enc_nsp_index"
> DETAIL: Key (collname, collencoding, collnamespace)=(collname, 6, 2200)
> already exists.

You get the same behavior with for example CREATE FUNCTION or CREATE
TYPE. I don't think we need to fix this specifically for CREATE COLLATION.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-30 20:33:21 Re: Segfault logical replication PG 10.4
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-07-30 20:25:50 Re: documentation about explicit locking