Re: In theory question

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net>
Cc: Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: In theory question
Date: 2007-05-09 17:29:02
Message-ID: 464204DE.2050906@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Naz Gassiep wrote:
> Hannes Dorbath wrote:
>> I think this is close to what MySQL's query cache does. The question
>> is if this should be the job of the DBMS and not another layer. At
>> least the pgmemcache author and I think that it's better done outside
>> the DBMS. See
>> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~seanc/pgmemcache/pgmemcache.pdf for the idea.
> This is exactly what I was asking about. So my theoretical idea has
> already been implemented. Now if only *all* my ideas were done for me by
> the time I came up with them :)

Then you wouldn't be able to eventually patent them ;)

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Naz Gassiep 2007-05-09 17:52:12 Re: In theory question
Previous Message Naz Gassiep 2007-05-09 17:19:44 Re: In theory question