Re:

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dan Harris <fbsd(at)drivefaster(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re:
Date: 2007-05-09 00:05:15
Message-ID: 4641103B.7000802@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dan Harris wrote:
> Orhan Aglagul wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I was trying to see how many inserts per seconds my application could
>> handle on various machines.
>>
>>
>> I read that postgres does have issues with MP Xeon (costly context
>> switching). But I still think that with fsync=on 65 seconds is
>> ridiculous.
>
> CPU is unlikely your bottleneck.. You failed to mention anything about
> your I/O setup. More details in this regard will net you better
> responses. However, an archive search for insert performance will
> probably be worthwhile, since this type of question is repeated about
> once a month.

He also fails to mention if he is doing the inserts one at a time or as
batch.

Joshua D. Drake

>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

  • Re: at 2007-05-08 23:48:59 from Dan Harris

Responses

  • Re: at 2007-05-09 00:20:29 from Carlos Moreno
  • Re: at 2007-05-09 01:12:16 from Orhan Aglagul

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carlos Moreno 2007-05-09 00:20:29 Re:
Previous Message Dan Harris 2007-05-08 23:48:59 Re: