Re: Throttling PostgreSQL's CPU usage

Carlos Moreno wrote:
> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> Or use a dual-core system. :-)
>
> Am I missing something?? There is just *one* instance of this idea in,
> what,
> four replies?? I find it so obvious, and so obviously the only solution
> that
> has any hope to work, that it makes me think I'm missing something ...
>
> Is it that multiple PostgreSQL processes will end up monopolizing as many
> CPU cores as you give it? (ok, that would suck, for sure :-))

PostgreSQL is process based, so if you have one query that is eating a
lot of cpu, it is only one cpu... you would have another for your render
to run on.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> If there is a way to guarantee (or at least to encourage) that PG will
> not use
> more than one, or even two cores, then a quad-core machine looks like a
> promising solution... One thing feels kind of certain to me: the kind of
> system that the OP describes has a most-demanding need for *extremely
> high* CPU power --- multi-core, or multi-CPU, would seem the better
> solution anyway, since it promotes responsiveness more than raw CPU
> power.
>
> Carlos
> --
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/