| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Date: | 2007-05-02 12:33:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4638851C.9060308@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Tom Lane wrote:
> So in a roundabout way we come back
> to the idea that we need a bug tracker (NOT a patch tracker), plus
> people putting in the effort to make sure it stays a valid source
> of up-to-date info. Without the latter it won't really be useful.
>
>
>
Hallelujah Brother!
BTW, a bug tracker can be used as a patch tracker, although the reverse
isn't true. For example, the BZ people use BZ that way, in fact - most
patches arrive as attachments to bugs. And trackers can be used just as
well for tracking features as well as bugs.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-02 13:18:31 | Re: strange buildfarm failures |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-02 12:27:00 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2007-05-02 13:27:00 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-02 12:11:12 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |