Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1
Date: 2007-04-27 11:57:30
Message-ID: 4631E52A.4060703@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> * The stats collector bug which prevented stats being collected
>> reliably, thus causing all the expected knock on effects (including
>> near-total failure of autovacuum). The 8.2 fix for this was dependent
>> on the redesign of the collector to remove the separate stats buffering
>> process.
>>
>> * Semaphore issues, fixed by the native implementation in 8.2.
>>
>>
>>
> I think these two justify declaring the Windows port at EOL prior to
> 8.2. The others probably not so much. (Who cares if pg_regress is not a
> C program? Who besides developers uses it?)

Yeah, a couple of those items were ones that might make backporting
fixes more difficult rather than issues in their own right. That one's
unlikely to be an issue though, I agree.

> I hope this will be a one-off exercise, though. In general we should
> declare releases to be at EOL, not ports.

Yes, that is absolutely the intention.

Regards, Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-04-27 11:57:59 Re: Hi, I wanto joinin the developer group of postgresql
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-04-27 11:53:52 Re: Windows support - PostgreSQL 8.0 and 8.1