Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] pgxs/config/missing is... missing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] pgxs/config/missing is... missing
Date: 2015-12-12 00:34:06
Message-ID: 4631.1449880446@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:
> Grr, right after sending this I found the thread you were talking about.

> I'm not really sure our missing is better than just letting the error
> bubble up. If folks think that's better then lets just rip missing out
> entirely.

Well, that's what I was suggesting in the other thread, but it wasn't
drawing consensus.

Don't know if you noticed, but I committed your earlier patch a few
hours ago. We can revert it if we somehow get to a consensus that
we don't need "missing".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shay Cohavi 2015-12-12 19:08:20 postgresql 9.3 failover time
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-12-12 00:29:23 Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] pgxs/config/missing is... missing

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-12-12 00:36:45 Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-12-12 00:29:23 Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] pgxs/config/missing is... missing