| From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Date: | 2007-04-23 21:53:08 |
| Message-ID: | 462D2AC4.4070109@pooteeweet.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> I was thinking about the upcoming release on my 32-hour epic airplane ordeal,
> and realizing that it changes PostgreSQL in a lot of ways. Between major
> improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to
> implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to
> more-or-less stick to deadlines ...
>
> ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?
Just wondering: does this have any implications about a possible end of
life of the 7.x branch?
regards,
Lukas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-23 21:57:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Robert Bernier | 2007-04-23 20:22:34 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-23 21:57:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-23 21:53:02 | Re: Better error message for select_common_type() |